The student news site of Linfield University

The Linfield Review

The student news site of Linfield University

The Linfield Review

The student news site of Linfield University

The Linfield Review

Hollywood should stop making everything in 3-D and focus on quality

Ever since “Avatar” was such a huge hit in 3-D, more and more movies have been released in this style. In little less than a year, more than 10 movies have been featured in 3-D, including “Alice in Wonderland,” “Step Up 3-D,” “Saw 3-D,” “Toy
Story 3-D,” “Megamind” and “Jackass 3-D.” While it is all fine and dandy that some of these movies were successful, Hollywood is saying 3-D is the new big thing, and frankly, I am tired of hearing about it.
Like I said: Only some of these movies have been extremely successful, and those are “Avatar” and “Jackass 3-D.”
Reviews of “Avatar,” such as the one written by CNN Entertainment, said that ‘‘‘Avatar’ stretches the bounds of the cinematic imagination. It shows us something we’ve never seen before: an entire alien world, a new and complex ecosystem rendered in three dimensions with dazzling fluidity and detail.”
Although CNN makes a point to recognize the 3-D aspect in “Avatar,” some have argued that “Avatar”’s success is not because it was 3-D; it was simply a great movie.
The same can be said about “Jackass 3-D.” According to portfolio.com, it brought in $50 million during its first three days in the U.S., and took the No. 1 spot in the box office. Even though it was an obvious success, it is not necessarily because the movie was in 3-D. In fact, “Jackass” was already prominent in popular culture before it became 3-D.
Besides these two movies, none of the other ones received as much positive feedback or hype. This means money was wasted in the filming process to make them 3-D.
Speaking of money, why would I want to pay the extra cost to see a mediocre 3-D movie? Ticket prices for 3-D movies have already risen 20 percent during this year alone and range anywhere from $8 to $16 depending on the type of theater you view it in.
Movies in 2-D are expensive as it is. So it is just a waste of money (money a lot of people do not have to waste during this difficult economical time) to spend even more on the same movie in 3-D.
Besides the extra cost, wearing special glasses to watch 3-D movies is also a pain. It is hard on the eyes, and it is difficult for people who wear prescription glasses to see the movie when they have to wear the 3-D glasses.
Now I am not saying that the film industry should stop making 3-D movies altogether, but it should definitely cut down on them, and it should stop trying to make every 3-D movie the next big hit like “Avatar.”

Jessica Prokop/Culture Editor
Jessica Prokop can be reached at [email protected]>

Leave a Comment
More to Discover

Comments (0)

All The Linfield Review Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *